Poker : All-in in Texas Hold'em Poker
By Joni Hawk
Level:
|
May 14th 2007 |
Dear Mark,
I need further clarification on how "all-in" works in Texas Hold'em. This happened on television the other night while I was watching a poker tournament: Player "A" with a massive amount of chips bet a substantial amount of money, and player "B," with far fewer chips, consequently went all-in. Do I understand that if player B had won he would only have received the portion of the pot that he could cover? If so what happens to the rest of the pot? Maribeth K.
To go "All-in," Maribeth, is to bet all the money you personally have on the table. A player who is all-in cannot be forced out of the pot, but can win only that portion of the pot that he or she is eligible for. In your example, player B did not have enough table stakes to cover future raises, so he went all-in. He was simply contesting that portion of the pot that his money would cover.
Had other players still been active in the hand, wagers could still have been made, but those bets would then comprise a side pot. At the end of the hand, the side pot is decided first, then the main pot. Player B would not be eligible to win the side pot since he had no money invested in it, and it would therefore be distributed among the surviving players as though there had been no Player B.
I need further clarification on how "all-in" works in Texas Hold'em. This happened on television the other night while I was watching a poker tournament: Player "A" with a massive amount of chips bet a substantial amount of money, and player "B," with far fewer chips, consequently went all-in. Do I understand that if player B had won he would only have received the portion of the pot that he could cover? If so what happens to the rest of the pot? Maribeth K.
To go "All-in," Maribeth, is to bet all the money you personally have on the table. A player who is all-in cannot be forced out of the pot, but can win only that portion of the pot that he or she is eligible for. In your example, player B did not have enough table stakes to cover future raises, so he went all-in. He was simply contesting that portion of the pot that his money would cover.
Had other players still been active in the hand, wagers could still have been made, but those bets would then comprise a side pot. At the end of the hand, the side pot is decided first, then the main pot. Player B would not be eligible to win the side pot since he had no money invested in it, and it would therefore be distributed among the surviving players as though there had been no Player B.
RELATED GAME STRATEGIES
Lesson 1: Poker HistoryWhere did this card game come from? How did it get its name? Find out here.
Lesson 2: Poker RulesThe basics and the variations. Rules and regulations… How do you play Poker anyways?
Lesson 3: Poker HandsSo you know the basics, find out what hand wins over what… Does a straight beat 3 Aces?
Lesson 4: Poker Betting“You gotta know when to hold them, know when to fold then”… and when to raise!
Lesson 5: Poker StrategyLearn how to play and point to follow to play smart
Lesson 6: Poker VocabularyImpress your buddies on Poker night, with High Roller lingo.
| 488 articles | (Can Casino Poker be Beaten?) | articles home | (Does the size of a bet effect...) |
Baccarat | Bingo | Blackjack | Casino Games | Craps | Gaming Tips | Keno | Others | Pai Gow Poker | Poker | Roulette | Slots | Table Games | Video Poker Games | Link to us
TopCasinoOffers.com is an independent information website, not affiliated with any casino.Copyright © 2003-2007 TopCasinoOffers.com - All Rights Reserved
All-in in Texas Hold'em Poker





